Arizona's Telescope Allocation Committee
TAC Membership
The TAC is small, and each member grades every proposal. Therefore, almost every proposal is read and graded by non-experts.
It is essential that proposers present the scientific
motivation for their proposal in language that astronomers outside their specific field can easily understand. This year's TAC members are:
| NAME | INSTITUTION | SPECIALITY |
|---|---|---|
| D. McCarthy (Chair) | Steward | IR, instruments, solar system, brown dwarfs, education |
| J. Eisner | Steward | star formation, extrasolar planets, astrobiology |
| G. Rieke | Steward | instrumentation, infrared astronomy, galactic and extra-galactic astronomy |
| D. Zaritsky | Steward | cosmology, galactic astronomy |
| C. Griffith | Lunar & Planetary Lab | planetary atmospheres, Titan |
| P. Scowen | Arizona State Univ. | star formation in galaxies, instrumentation |
| R. Windhorst | Arizona State Univ. | galaxy formation and evolution, cosmology |
| D. Trilling | Northern Arizona Univ. | stellar and planetary systems, planets |
Before each meeting, TAC members read and grade every proposal except in cases of a conflict of interest. Telescope schedulers provide the TAC a list of available time (bright, gray, dark). For each telescope, proposals are then ranked according to their average grade.
TAC members generally base their grades on
The TAC meets approximately two weeks after the deadline for proposals. During its meetings, the TAC discusses these rankings as well as each individual proposal. Members may change their grades based on this discussion, and proposals may be re-ranked. The final rankings are provided to the schedulers who generate a preliminary schedule for all telescopes. A final schedule is posted online about one month prior to the start of the next trimester.